\n');
}
// Use to put a message in the bottom of the browser when the cursor
// passes over certain text or a certain graphic.
function postStatus(statusMessage){
window.status=statusMessage
return true
}
// Use to pop up the e-mail menu
function sendEMail(myLevel) {
// myLevel is the level from which this is called. If it is at the top
// level (equal with index.htm), myLevel=1. If it is in a folder below
// that, it is level 2. And so forth.
var thePrefix = ""
for (i=1; i This lesson comprises: At the completion of this lesson you will be able to: As the second part of Acts deals with Paul’s missionary ventures into Gentile
territory, and as the NT epistles are addressed to localities within such territory,
it is imperative that we understand the social and religious milieu of the first
century Greco-Roman world. At the outset we need to note what is implied in this hyphenated term. Rome
was the dominant power and the systems of administration and government were
Roman, but Greek (Hellenist) culture still pervaded the empire (language, architecture,
philosophy etc.). This cultural legacy stemmed from Alexander the Great, who
saw Greek culture as a gift to the nations he conquered. As a consequence, Rome already had unity amongst the diversity of the nations
it subjugated. The Greeks were intellectually superior and Greek ideas and technical
skill were not opposed by Rome, but seen as instruments of cohesion within the
empire. Up until mid first century BC the Roman empire was a mixture of oligarchy
and military dictatorships. What is an oligarchy? If unsure, look it up in a dictionary The latter finally gave way to the rise of the first emperor Julius Caesar,
who was murdered in 44BC. Power was seized by Julius’ adopted son (his grandnephew)
Gaius Octavius, who eventually defeated his chief rival Mark Antony at the battle
of Actium (31 BCE). Octavian was now sole ruler of the empire. Octavian was
bestowed with the honorific title “Augustus” by the Roman senate. He saw himself
as a benevolent ruler who sought the following: Rome pursued various ways of unifying such a diverse empire. Roman citizenship
rights were gradually extended to the provinces, with double citizenship not
uncommon (as per Paul [Acts 21:39]). Roman propaganda was disseminated via coinage,
which bore the emperor’s inscription and images of military victories (eg. over
Jerusalem in AD 70). Further, the emperor was promoted as the supreme benefactor
of all who pledged allegiance to Rome. In fact, Augustus termed himself pater
patriae - father of the country. In addition to the above, oaths of allegiance to the emperor were demanded,
and together with the deification of past emperors this formed the basis for
the emergence of an emperor cult. This cult was administered by the temples
and priests, which involved the offering of perfunctory sacrifice. The Jews
were granted exemption from this, but of course the Christians could not comply.
Why were Christians unable to comply with the demand for oaths of allegiance? There was a universal system of law, but differences of rights and benefits
between citizens and non-citizens (see Acts 25:9-12). The presence of the pax Romana (Roman peace) enabled free and safe travel within
the empire. The Mediterranean had been cleared of pirates, and while highway
robbery was not eliminated (see 2 Cor 11:26) it had been curtailed significantly. The Romans constructed a road system that in many cases has endured to the
present day. This enabled free merchant trade. In terms of religious values there was religious and philosophical tolerance,
with a free exchange of ideas. Greek was spoken extensively throughout the empire and was the official language
in the East. By the 1st C AD religion was quite materialistic and fatalistic.
The old pantheon of the gods no longer captured the devotion of the masses,
although perfunctory rites were performed at festival occasions. The reasons
for this shift were: a) The immorality of the gods themselves: the gods were not good models for
society! Furthermore the associated cultic rites often seen as immoral (revolting
to even the pagan mind!) b) Syncretism was confusing and not intellectually compelling What is syncretism? If unsure, look it up in a dictionary c) Greek science and cosmology (cosmology is one's view of the order of the
cosmos): Thus somewhat of a spiritual vacuum was apparent, and various options arose
by which one may satisfy the spiritual longing within. These may be summarised
as follows: a) Demonology b) Astrology c) Magic d) Mystery Religions The "mysteries" were private religions that were open to those willing
to go through initiation procedures including secret rites that involves preparation
by purification and fasting. The language of ‘dying and rising’ and ‘new birth’
was sometimes used for this. Other features were: The obvious question that arises is the link between the mystery religions
and early Christianity? Based on the above notes and your own reading, what
are the similarities and differences? Similarities: e) Gnosis The religious form of Gnosis is salvation by illumination. Knowledge frees
one from the material world to the higher world of spirit (e.g. dualism with
a focus on asceticism). The spirit within is the divine spark which needs liberation
from the physical world. Although there was not fully a developed Gnosticism until the second century,
elements of that later belief appear to be present in the NT period (see Colossians,
1 John). f) Philosophy By the first century there was a shift away from the intellectual philosophy
of Plato and Aristotle to a more ethically orientated philosophy. Philosophical
debate was no longer a product of the classroom but now discussed in the market
place (see Acts 17). The main philosophical schools were: a. Epicureanism b. Stoicism Origins of diaspora ( = dispersion) Judaism go back to the Babylonian captivity
(587 BC), but was given further impetus by voluntary migration of Jews during
the Hellenistic period. By the beginning of the Christian era Jews were scattered
throughout the civilised world (Acts 2:9-11), though they still regarded Jerusalem
as their spiritual home. Approx 50,000 Jews lived in Rome at this time, and Philo stated that there
were a million in Egypt and the surrounding regions. Diaspora Jews needed to develop a system of worship that was not dependent
upon the temple and sacrificial system. Thus a focus developed on: The diaspora gave rise to the ‘synagogue’. The earliest found is 1st
century BC, but there were apparently 11 synagogues in Rome. The synagogue movement
enabled Judaism to survive post 70 AD. Why do you think this was the case? Thus Christianity had a ready made contact point for the gospel as it spread
beyond Palestinian borders, for Jewish synagogues existed in all major regional
centres. And the Gentile Godfearers, who were well versed in the OT, formed
a vital component of those synagogue. In terms of the relationship of Jews to pagan society, attitudes were mixed.
Some embraced aspects of Greek culture (as they did in Palestine), others were
more sectarian. All spoke Greek, and many would have spoken nothing but Greek.
But having said this, all Jews were known for their rigid monotheism and distinctive
moral lifestyle (though some were more lax than others regarding the law - e.g.
Jews of Phrygia). Because of its uniqueness, Judaism was attractive to many Greeks and Romans.
They could read the Jewish scriptures in Greek (the LXX), and could become full
proselytes through circumcision. Others had the status of ‘Godfearers’ (Acts
10:1-48). Why do you think that Judaism was an attractive religious option for Greeks
and Romans? The most significant Hellenist Jew was Philo of Alexandria (c. 15 BC – c. 50
AD). Philo sought to integrate Greek philosophy and Judaism via an allegorical
interpretation of the OT. He argued that the two systems are not incompatible
but are actually saying the same thing. For example, Abraham marries Wisdom
in the person of Sarah. The following chart from Blomberg, Jesus and the Gospels, p. 38, provides
a helpful summary of first century religious options in the Greco-Roman world
See the attached extract from Drane, J., Introducing the New Testament, pp.
14-29 (click here). For those with library access, a selection of the following will also be of
value, but are optional: The Jewish revolt, culminating in the destruction of the temple in AD 70, is
an event of immense importance for the following reasons: The revolt involves a complex interaction of events and we should avoid simplistic
assessments. To a large extent it depends on the source being read, all of which
have their bias. But the major causes appear to be: Disputes over Jewish privileges in this mainly Gentile city led to rioting.
The Roman procurator Felix ordered military intervention (to the detriment of
the Jews) and sent both parties to Rome to have the matter adjudicated by Nero.
Felix himself was recalled, and the emperor found in favour of the Gentiles.
But the Gentiles inflamed the situation by arrogant attitudes and offensive
behaviour. For example a bird was sacrificed outside the synagogue door, thus
implying that those within were leprous. The Jews appealed to the new procurator
Florus, to no avail. This culminated in Florus, who was unequalled in terms of stupidity and lack
of integrity. He was open to bribery, and even raided the temple treasury and
stole 17 talents. This obviously provoked a riot upon which Florus had a number
of leading citizens crucified. Several attempts to pacify the people failed,
and the daily offering for the welfare of the emperor was stopped. This was,
in effect, a declaration of revolt against Rome. As a result of the above, Jewish revolutionary zeal increased. The Antonia
fortress (adjacent to the temple) was seized and the Roman garrison destroyed.
A zealot faction, which a little while previously had taken the fortress at
Masada on the Dead Sea, heard of the events in Jerusalem and saw this as a ripe
time to join the rebellion. They were led by Menahem, a descendant of Judas the Galilean. They managed
to take the western part of Jerusalem, but Menahem and Eleazar (the leader of
the revolt in Jerusalem) fought amongst themselves and the former was eventually
killed. At this point Mehahem’s faction returned to Masada. In November 66 AD the Syrian governor Cestius Gallus marched on Jerusalem
to quash the rebellion. He occupied the northern portion of the city then retreated
(possibly to gather more forces). But his army was ambushed at the Pass of Beth-horan
and was decimated. This only caused to inflame the insurrectionist fervour in
Jerusalem. Vespasian arrived in Spring of 67 AD from Rome to take charge of the situation.
He subdued Judea and arrived at Jerusalem in mid 68 AD, but upon hearing of
Nero’s death he stopped to await new orders. A period of civil instability followed
in Rome, so Vespasian suspended operations temporarily. Rather than take this
opportunity to marshal the forces and present a united front against the Romans,
the rival Jewish movements and leaders fought amongst themselves (e.g. Simon
bar Giora, John of Gischala, Eleazar). Vespasian resumed operations in June
69 AD, but returned to Rome after being proclaimed emperor shortly after. Vespasian’s eldest son Titus took over the military reigns and began the siege
of Jerusalem in April 70 AD. The temple was occupied and burnt in August of
that year. There was apparently some debate over whether this was a wise course
of action (Josephus states that Titus tried to save it – but Josephus cannot
be considered impartial at this point). All resistance crushed by the end of
September. Masada was the last zealot stronghold, but this fell in 73 AD when the revolutionaries
committed mass suicide in the face of inevitable defeat. Josephus was actually a leader of the insurrectionist forces in Galilee, and
was captured by Vespasian in 67 AD. He was spared when he hailed the general
as emperor-designate. When this was actualised, Vespasian held him in honour
and Josephus spent the remainder of his life in Rome at the imperial residence.
During his life in Rome Josephus wrote two important historical works: Both works have a bias, especially the latter which was written to defend the
actions of Rome as God-ordained (for example, blame is placed solely with the
zealot hotheads, and the defence of Titus who sought to spare the temple). Josephus' two other works are: Josephus is an important historical source for Christian scholarship (even
given his tendentiousness) in that he gives a detailed account of life in first
century Palestine . He corroborates much of what is either stated or apparent
in the NT, but there are some historical discrepancies (e.g. Acts 5:36-37). This powerful man who had wide support was leader of this second revolt. He
was given the name Bar Kochba (= son of the star - a messianic designation),
conferred upon him by Rabbi Akiba. His leadership was rejected by Jewish Christians,
who could not support either him or the revolt, and thus were persecuted by
their fellow Jews. Emperor Hadrian promised to return Jerusalem to the Jews, whereupon the temple
could be rebuilt. But he went back on his word and sought to construct Jerusalem
as a pagan city. He consequently banned circumcision in 132 AD. In response the Jews hoarded weapons and planned revolt. They were supported
by both non-Jews and Samaritans. Unlike the first war, Bar Kochba led a united
resistance, with compulsory conscription. Land belonging to Rome was taken and
leased out by the new Jewish government, and coins minted dated in the year
of ”the redemption of Israel”. Twelve Roman legions fought in the war (legion = 6000 men). The rebels were
forced to move to the final stronghold of Bether, which fell in 135 AD. The
Roman historian Dio Cassius states that the following casualties occurred: The set texts do not deal with this topic adequately. Any of the following
offer good treatments: Bruce, F. F., New Testament History, pp. 349-372 (or pp. 368-392). Levine, L. I., “Jewish War (66-73 C.E.)”, Anchor Bible Dictionary, Vol. 3 pp.
839-845. Yadin, Y., “Masada,” IDB Supp., pp. 577-580. Yadin, Y., “Bar Kochba”, IDB Supp., pp. 89-92. The key issues in this lesson are: Submit the following exercise to your designated e-coach:NT302 - Lesson 1: Greco-Roman Civilisation: The Social and Religious World
Overview
Aims for this Lesson
Greco-Roman Civilisation: The Social and Religious
World
Introduction
1. The Consolidation of the
Roman Empire
Exercise
2. Means of the Unification of
the Empire
Exercise
3. Travel and Communication
4. The Religious Milieu
i) The Passing of the gods
Exercise
The gods/deities were believed to reside in the outer regions of the stars.
There was a stress on cosmic order, transcendence and universal law. There was
also an emphasis on fate, tied to astrology.ii) Coping with the Spiritual Vacuum
A natural consequence of viewing God (gods) as transcendent was to develop belief
in a system of intermediary beings who related directly to human affairs. The
daemons were considered to be both good and evil powers who could indwell human
beings. Such beliefs caused fear, dread and superstition.
The origins of astrology lay in Babylonia, but it became very popular in the
Hellenistic world. It rode on the back of the study of astronomy, a science
that was centred in Alexandria. Astrology thus posed as a pseudo-science.
Magic was linked to demonology and superstition, and sought to compel the spiritual
forces to act via the recitation of formulae or the observance of certain rites.
Ephesus (see Acts 19:18ff) and Egypt were major centres for the practice of
magic.
This is an all-embracing term for a myriad of secret religious cults, whose
origins lay in tribal cults and fertility rituals. The mystery religion worshipped
a particular deity in the Greco-Roman region. They were quite popular for a
number of reasons:
Exercise
Differences:
Exercise
Exercise
Summary

Blomberg, Jesus and the Gospels, p. 38 Reading
The Jewish Revolts
Introduction
1. Factors that led to the Revolt
a) The Caesarea Factor
b) Irresponsible Procurators
c) Insurrectionist Groups
2. The Jewish War (66-73 AD)
a) Cestius Gallus
b) Vespasian
c) Titus
d) Josephus
3. The Bar Kochba Revolt (132-135 AD)
a) Simeon ben Kosiba
b) The Revolt
Further Reading:
Lesson Summary
Assessment Exercise
Given that the attractiveness of Judaism to many in the Greco-Roman world was
due in part to the failure of the Greco-Roman religious options to meet real
spiritual needs, what might this have to say to the Christian church at our
particular point in history?